Islam
Talk number 1, October 3rd, 2006

 

The Roman Empire was gradually converted to the Catholic Faith in a period of three centuries – from 30 AD to 330.

The Roman army, on which the whole structure of society depended, had been more and more recruited from half-civilized tribes: Slaves and Germans.

Under such circumstances central authority broke down and the Roman Empire entered the so called Dark Ages (about 476 to 1000 AD)

About 1000 Western Europe awoke to the Middle Ages, a time of learning, building and the arts. Europe was unified under the Catholic Faith.

In the 7th century arose the religion of Mohammed who preached beyond the effective boundaries of the Empire.

Muslims believe that Muhammad was God’s final prophet until the end of time; they believe that God revealed his direct word for humanity to Muhammad (570-632) through the angel Gabriel. Earlier prophets included Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus.

They say that Jews changed the Torah and Christians changed the gospel.

The fundamental concept of Islam is the Oneness of God. They consider the trinity as the worship of three gods (polytheism).

There are several groups within Islam. Sunnis are the largest group (85%) and Shi’a (15%). Wahabis are classified as Sunnis.

The medieval Islamic state was often more tolerant than many other states of the time which insisted on complete conformity to a state religion. The record of contemporary Muslim-majority states is mixed.

Hard line Muslims claim that once a territory has been under Muslim rule it can never be relinquished and that such a period of Islamic rule gives the Muslims eternal right to the claimed territory, e.g. Israel, Spain and parts of the Balkans.

Muslims believe that the God they worship is the same God of Abraham. Christians usually see it otherwise.

He preached a powerful new heresy to which he and his followers converted by force and zeal.

It was a simplification of the Catholic Faith, eliminating nearly all that seemed difficult to the untrained masses: the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Sacrament of the Eucharist and the priesthood.

The creed of the Mohammedans would be the most dangerous religious movement to afflict Christianity until the time of Luther.

Like the later Reformation Protestants the Prophet Mohamed preached a simple, rational religion. It was a religion of the book (the Koran.)

Islam appealed to the common man because it offered worldly as well as otherworld benefits. The majority of Muslims are not Arabs.

A man was allowed as many as four wives at a time and any number of concubines. Unlimited divorce is available. Prior to Muhammad men in Arabia sometimes had hundreds of wives. Islam introduced moderation and raised the status of women.

Sharia law makes the crime of rape virtually impossible to prove. The testimony of the victim herself is inadmissible. Four male witnesses are required to prove rape. They must have witnessed the rape in graphic detail. A Muslim woman who is raped is often afraid to file a complaint with police, for in the absence of four male witnesses her testimony can be taken as admission of adultery or fornication – a crime that could cost her her life.

Women were valued at half that of a man. Women were seen as evil creatures, not likely to go to heaven because of their evil nature.

Complaining husbands have permission to beat their wives. Complaining wives get criticized for complaining. (Sura 4:34: "Send them to beds apart and beat them.")

Muslim women must have permission from their husbands to leave the home.

It had a creed of Holy War which attracted the nomadic tribes of the desert who could now raid and pillage in the name of God and of divine conquest.

The afterlife promised to followers of Mohammed was a tower of luxury with an inexhaustible supply of beautiful virgins to satisfy one’s every sexual desire.

Not long after Mohammed’s death in 632 his Arab followers swept north making converts. Those who jointed, if they were slaves or debtors, recovered their freedom and saw themselves free from the imperial government.

Islam revered Jesus Christ as the greatest of the prophets but rejected the Trinity. It revered Our Lady. It had little ritual; only prayers that all could follow.

Within a century Islam had mastered and was governing Syria, North Africa and most of Spain. They were thrown back from the heart of France south to the Pyrenees.

Islam chiefs and their soldiers gained political power even though the majority of their subjects were Christians.

The Mongol hordes were welcomed by Islamic leaders. They became fanatically Islamic. These hordes are generally known as the "Turks". Their function was lust for cruelty and destruction.

The encouragement of the Turks was the great and nearly mortal wound delivered indirectly by Islam to the civilization of Europe.

It was the Turks who overcame the Byzantine power at the battle of Manzikert in 1071 under Alp Arslan.

 

Alp Arslan (1029 – December 15, 1072) was the second sultan of the dynasty of Seljuk Turks, in Persia, and great-grandson of Seljuk, the founder of the dynasty. He assumed the name of Muhammad when he embraced Islam, and on account of his military prowess and personal valor and fighting skills he obtained the surname Alp Arslan, which signifies "a valiant lion."

 

This paved the way for Turkish dominance in Anatolia (Asia Minor). This also marked the beginning of the decline of the Byzantine Empire. In the centuries after Manzikert, the relatively small number of Turkic immigrants began to assimilate local populations as their numbers grew. Anatolia was an ethnic mosaic, a region with a wide variety of peoples, but dominated by the Byzantine Greeks and other prominent regional groups such as Armenians, Kurds, and others.


Points in Pope Benedict XVI’s talk by George Weigel:

1. "Faith and reason cannot be in conflict. True faith is reasonable faith, faith that makes sense, faith that can be proposed as reasonable to another.

2. "Our idea of God has a lot to do with how we think about the world, ourselves and our moral obligations. Christianity proposed a God of reason, love and compassion. This idea of God shapes Jewish and Christian convictions that the world is intelligible and that people of reason and goodwill can build decent societies based on reasonable standards of behavior.

3. Current Islamic though is different. God is utterly transcendent; a majestic, unapproachable lawgiver to whom the only appropriate response is absolute submission of our minds and wills. Taken to extremes it may suggest that God can command anything, e.g. suicide bombing. Many jihadist Muslims around the world, including Ahmadinejad, believe that the killing of innocents is pleasing to God if it advances Islam’s cause.

4. The pope may have wanted to extend a helping hand to those Islamic reformers who are trying to convince the extremists that irrational violence in the name of God is offensive to the one true God.

 

Talk number 2, October 10th, 2006

 

The Great Schism

Michael Cerularius was Patriarch of Constantinople from 1043 to 1059.

He is noted for disputing with Pope Leo IX (1049 to 1054) over church practices where the Roman Church began to differ from the east, especially the use of unleavened bread in the Eucharist.

Though normally dated to 1054 the East-West Schism was actually the result of an extended period of estrangement between the two Churches.

The primary causes were disputes over papal authority. The Pope claimed authority over the four Eastern patriarchs (Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople and Jerusalem), while the churches of the east claimed that the primacy of the Patriarch of Rome was only honorary.

Disunion in the Roman Empire contributed to disunion in the Church. The last Emperor to rule over a united Roman Empire was Theodosius the Great (379 to 395). After his death, the empire permanently split into the Eastern and Western Empires, each with its own Emperor.

By the end of the 5th century the Western Roman Empire had been destroyed by barbarians while the Eastern Roman Empire (aka Byzantine Empire) continued to thrive. Thus the political unity of the Roman Empire was the first to fall.

Michael Cerularius, the Eastern Patriarch, persecuted and shut down Latin-rite churches in the East. In response the pope excommunicated him in 1054. The Patriarch, in turn, excommunicated the Holy See. This inflamed the nationalism of the Eastern churches and led them into schism.

Rome viewed the schism as temporary, and still does.

When Emperor Alexius (1081 to 1118) asked the Pope for help against the Muslims Pope Urban II (1088 to 1099) had no qualms about directing Catholic knights to rescue the schismatic emperor in Constantinople.

(Byzantine: of or relating to the churches using a traditional Greek rite and subject to Eastern canon law.)

Urban II

The occasion which launched the Crusade was the action of one man, Pope Urban II (1088 – 1099). Urban II was French, a man of minor nobility.

The man who so willed and acted was he who had been made pope to continue the work of the Great St. Gregory VII (Hildebrand) who had preceded him in the papacy

On November 8, 1095 at Clermont, Auvergne (central France) Urban gave the word "Deus vult’.

Changes had come to Syria: the detested Turk in place of the old Arabian dignity, the bullying, and worse, of the pilgrims to the Holy Places, the desecration of the Sepulcher of the Lord.

It was time to save the imperiled Byzantine Christians and to liberate the holy places, especially the Holy Sepulcher.

.The Byzantine Emperor, Alexius, had begged Rome for help, but he was acutely aware of how dangerous it was to have these French warlords on his doorstep.

Manzikert

On August 19th, 1071, the great-grandson of Seljuk, the Turk, Alp Arslan, struck a fatal blow.

After many invasions by the Mongols, which were destructive but did not change the political situation, one far worse and of far greater consequence than any before befell the Christian world.

Until that moment Asia Minor had stood strong as the bastion of the Christian world. It furnished the economic basis of Constantinople and its military basis as well. If Asia Minor were overrun, Constantinople would come next and Europe would be open to the destroyer.

The Battle of Manzikert was fought between the Byzantine Empire under Emperor Romanus Diogenes and the Seljuk forces led by Alp Arslan. The location was modern Turkey (then part of Armenia).

The forces of the Emperor consisted of a force of sixty thousand highly trained men from the Empire.

He became isolated from the bulk of his army, which turned to flight, believing that the emperor had been killed. The disorderly withdrawal of the Byzantine army allowed the Seljuk Sultan to capture Romanus and inflict a disastrous defeat on his forces.

Romanus was treated with respect by his captor, who at first had difficulty believing the dusty and tattered warrior brought before him was the Roman Emperor. But then he treated him with extreme kindness, never saying a cruel word to him in the Emperor's eight day stay in his camp, and then released him in exchange for a treaty and the promise of a hefty ransom.

Gibbon in "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" recorded that Alp Arslan and Romanos IV Diogenes had a most interesting conversation at their meeting. According to Gibbon, when the Sultan asked the Emperor what he should do with him, the Emperor replied "if you are cruel, you will take my life; if you listen to pride, you will drag me at your chariot wheels; if you consult your interest, you will accept a ransom and restore me to my country." When the Sultan asked the Emperor what treatment he could have expected had he been the one vanquished, the Emperor's fierce nature made him reply ""Had I vanquished, I would have inflicted on thy body many a stripe."

The Sultan then lecturing the Emperor on Christian forgiveness, and then nobly declared he would not follow an example, the Emperor's, which he abhorred. He then forgave the Emperor, gave him generous terms, put him in a robe reserved for Seljuk royalty, loaded him with presents, and set him free.

The bulk of the Byzantine army was no more. Asia Minor lay open to a swirling tide of Mongol barbarians. The Greek and Christian civilization had received a mortal wound. The Mongols overran Asia Minor.

Within 50 years the whole of interior Asia Minor was ruined.

Manzikert was the shock that launched the Crusade. The shock would have destroyed us but for the Crusade. But the West moved. Western Europe faced east and went forward.

The issue was the life or death of Christendom.

Byzantium was no longer capable of being the protector of Eastern Christianity or of Christian pilgrims to the Holy Places in the Middle East.

First Crusade – a history

Since the time of Constantine, Christians had gone on pilgrimages to the Holy Land. Even though Moslems had ruled Jerusalem since 638, Christians were still allowed to visit the city. By the 11th century, however, the situation had changed. Just as the number and frequency of pilgrimages to Jerusalem was at new peaks, the Seljuk Turks took over control of Jerusalem and prevented pilgrimages.

Society in 11th century Western Europe was a unified Christendom. All were united under one faith and one supreme spiritual leader, the pope. To understand this is to understand the mentality of the people of the time.

They knew nothing of nation states and their absolute sovereignty. They were highly spiritually motivated. They were bound together by a common worship, above all by the Mass.

The recruiting field of the First Crusade was from that part of Christendom which included Italy, the Rhine Valley, the upper Danube, England, Southern Scotland, France, the Netherlands, Scandinavia and the northern part of the Spanish Peninsula.

The chief personage in the West was no longer an Emperor, but the Pope, even though he had no central civil rule.

90% of the whole Crusading army was Gallic.

Pope Urban II (1088-1099) was responsible for assisting Emperor Alexius I (1081-1118) of Constantinople in launching the first crusade. He made one of the most influential speeches in the Middle-Ages, calling on Christian princes in Europe to go on a crusade to rescue the Holy Land from the Turks. In the speech given at the Council of Clermont in France, on November 27, 1095, he combined the ideas of making a pilgrimage to the Holy Land with that of waging a holy war against infidels.

A summary of the pope's speech, which has been recorded differently in various sources:

"The noble race of Franks must come to the aid their fellow Christians in the East. The infidel Turks are advancing into the heart of Eastern Christendom; Christians are being oppressed and attacked; churches and holy places are being defiled. Jerusalem is groaning under the Saracen yoke. The Holy Sepulcher is in Moslem hands and has been turned into a mosque. Pilgrims are harassed and even prevented from access to the Holy Land.

"The West must march to the defense of the East. All should go, rich and poor alike. The Franks must stop their internal wars and squabbles. Let them go instead against the infidel and fight a righteous war.

"God himself will lead them, for they will be doing His work. There will be absolution and remission of sins for all who die in the service of Christ. Here they are poor and miserable sinners; there they will be rich and happy. Let none hesitate; they must march next summer. God wills it!

"The day after Urban's speech, the Council formally granted all the privileges and protections Urban had promised. The red cross was taken as the official sign of the pilgrims, and Bishop Adhemar of Le Puy was chosen as papal legate and the spiritual leader of the expedition."

The idea of the crusade corresponds to a political conception which was realized in Christendom only from the eleventh to the fifteenth century; this supposes a union of all peoples and sovereigns under the direction of the popes. All crusades were announced by preaching. After pronouncing a solemn vow, each warrior received a cross from the hands of the pope or his legates, and was thenceforth considered a soldier of the Church. Crusaders were also granted indulgences and temporal privileges, such as exemption from civil jurisdiction, inviolability of persons or lands, etc.

The Armies

· Godfrey of Bouillon arrived at Constantinople, 23 December, 1096.

· Robert of Flanders assembled there in May, 1097.

· Raymond of Saint-Gilles, Count of Toulouse reached Constantinople in April, 1097.

· Lastly, the Normans of Southern Italy, won over by the enthusiasm of the bands of crusaders that passed through their country, embarked under the command of Bohemond of Taranto, the eldest son of Robert Guiscard. They reached Constantinople in 26 April, 1097.

The appearance of the crusading armies at Constantinople raised the greatest trouble, and helped to bring about in the future irremediable misunderstandings between the Greeks and the Latin Christians.

The unsolicited invasion of the latter alarmed Alexius, who tried to prevent the concentration of all these forces at Constantinople by transporting to Asia Minor each Western army in the order of its arrival; moreover, he endeavored to extort from the leaders of the crusade a promise that they would restore to the Greek Empire the lands they were about to conquer.

After resisting the imperial entreaties throughout the winter, Godfrey of Bouillon, at length consented to take the oath of fealty. Bohemond and Robert unhesitatingly assumed the same obligation; Raymond of Toulouse, however, remained obdurate.

Entering Asia Minor (Anatolia; modern Turkey) the crusaders laid siege to the city of Nicaea but did not enter it (1 June 1097). Soon they took Edessa and moved into Syria on 20 October 1097 and the fortified city of Antioch. On 2 June 1098 the crusaders took Antioch by storm.

With these conquests came a greater sense of security and the reestablishment of Christian civilization. Pilgrims now receive some protection, though the journey was still dangerous

After in-house differences, it was not until April 1099 that the march towards Jerusalem was begun. On 7 June the crusaders began the siege of Jerusalem. The attack of Jerusalem began 14 July 1099. The next day the Christians entered Jerusalem from all sides and slew its inhabitants regardless of age or sex.

Godfrey of Bouillon was popularly chosen as lord of the new conquest. He called himself "Defender of the Holy Sepulcher".

The First Crusade was the most successful from a military point of view. Accounts of this action are shocking.

Some of our men cut off the heads of their enemies; others shot them with arrows, so that they fell from the towers; others tortured them longer by casting them into the flames. Piles of heads, hands and feet were to be seen in the streets of the city. It was necessary to pick one's way over the bodies of men and horses.

Some of the results of the first crusade were not expected. Alexius I thought that the Byzantine territories would be returned to him and the Eastern Empire, but instead the European conquerors established four independent Latin kingdoms. In addition, three religious/military orders (Hospitallers, Templars, and Teutonic Knights) came into power. The stated purpose of these orders was to protect pilgrims and holy sites.

During the first half of the twelfth century the Christian states of the East were completely organized, and even eclipsed in wealth and prosperity of most of the Western states.

 

Talk number 3, October 17th, 2006

 

First destructions of the Christian States (1144-87)

Many dangers, unfortunately, threatened this prosperity. On the south were the Caliphs of Egypt, on the east the Seljuk Ameers of Damascus, Hamah and Aleppo, and on the north the Byzantine emperors, eager to bring the Latin states under their power.

Moreover, in the presence of so many enemies the Christian states lacked cohesion and discipline. The help they received from the West was too scattered and intermittent. Nevertheless these Western knights, isolated amid Mohammedans and forced, because of the torrid climate, to lead a life far different from that to which they had been accustomed at home, displayed admirable bravery and energy in their efforts to save the Christian colonies.

Saladin invaded the Kingdom of Jerusalem and, although Guy de Lusignan gathered all his forces to repel the attack, on 4 July, 1187, Saladin's army annihilated that of the Christians on the shores of Lake Tiberias. The king, the grand master of the Temple, Renaud de Châtillon, and the most powerful men in the realm were made prisoners. After slaying Renaud with his own hand, Saladin marched on Jerusalem. The city capitulated 17 September, and Tyre, Antioch, and Tripoli were the only places in Syria that remained to the Christians.

Salah al-Din (1138–1193) was a 12th century Kurdish Muslim warrior from Tikrit, in present day northern Iraq. He was renowned in both the Muslim and Christian worlds for his leadership and military prowess tempered by his chivalry and merciful nature, during his war against the Crusaders.

The legacy of the Crusades

Viewed in the light of their original purpose, the Crusades were failures. They made no permanent conquests of the Holy Land. They slowed down but did not retard the advance of Islam. Far from aiding the Eastern Empire, they hastened its disintegration. They also revealed the continuing inability of Latin Christians to understand Greek Christians, and they hardened the schism between them. They fostered a harsh intolerance between Muslims and Christians, where before there had been a measure of mutual respect. They were marked, and marred, by a revival of anti-Semitism....

The papacy gained the most from the Crusades. Its authority was greatly increased. The power of European kings also increased in that a number of barons who had given them trouble went to the East.4

The Crusades

It has been customary to describe the Crusades as eight in number:

· the first, 1095-1101:

After Byzantine emperor Alexius I called for help with defending his empire against the Seljuk Turks, in 1095. At the Council of Clermont Pope Urban II called upon all Christians to join a war against the Turks, a war which would count as full penance. Crusader armies managed to defeat two substantial Turkish forces at Dorylaeum (in Asia Minor) and at Antioch, finally marching to Jerusalem with only a fraction of their original forces. In 1099, they took Jerusalem by assault and massacred the population. As a result of the First Crusade, several small Crusader states were created, notably the Kingdom of Jerusalem.

the second, headed by Louis VII, 1145-47:

After a period of relative peace, in which Christians and Muslims co-existed in the Holy Land, Bernard of Clairvaux preached a new crusade when the town of Edessa was conquered by the Turks. French and German armies under Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany, marched to Asia Minor in 1147, but failed to accomplish any major successes, and indeed endangered the survival of the Crusader states with a foolish attack on Damascus. By 1150, both leaders had returned to their countries without any result.

· the third, conducted by Philip Augustus and Richard Coeur-de-Lion, 1188-92:

In 1187, Saladin, Sultan of Egypt, recaptured Jerusalem. Pope Gregory VIII called for a crusade, which was led by several of Europe's most important leaders: Philip II of France, Richard I of England and Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor. Frederick drowned in Cilicia in 1190, leaving an unstable alliance between the English and the French. Philip left, in 1191, after the Crusaders had recaptured Acre from the Muslims. The Crusader army headed down the coast of the Mediterranean Sea. They defeated the Muslims near Arsuf and were in sight of Jerusalem. However, the inability of the Crusaders to thrive in the locale due to inadequate food and water resulted in an empty victory. Richard left the following year after establishing a truce with Saladin. On Richard's way home, his ship was wrecked and he ended up in Austria. In Austria, his enemy, Duke Leopold, captured him, delivered him to Frederick's son Henry VI and Richard was held for a king's ransom. By 1197, Henry felt himself ready for a Crusade, but he died in the same year of malaria.

· the fourth, during which Constantinople was taken, 1204:

Jerusalem having fallen back into Muslim hands a decade earlier, the Fourth Crusade was initiated in 1202 by Pope Innocent III, with the intention of invading the Holy Land through Egypt.

If the crusaders would sail to Constantinople and topple the reigning emperor, Alexius offered to reunite the Byzantine church with Rome, pay the crusaders an enormous sum, and join the crusade to Egypt with a large army. It was a tempting offer for an enterprise that was short on funds. The Byzantine prince's proposal involved his restoration to the throne, and not the sack of his capital city. Boniface agreed, and Alexius returned with Boniface to rejoin the fleet at Corfu after it had sailed from Zara. The rest of the crusade leaders eventually accepted the plan as well, but a great many of the rank and file wanted nothing to do with the proposal, and many deserted. The fleet arrived at Constantinople in late June, 1203.

The Venetians, under Doge (leader) Enrico Dandolo, gained control of this crusade and diverted it, first to the Christian city of Zara, (the Italian name of the Adriatic port city of Zadar former capital of Dalmatia, in Croatia) then to Constantinople where they attempted to place a Byzantine exile on the throne. After a series of misunderstandings and outbreaks of violence, the city was sacked by the crusaders in 1204.

When Innocent III heard of the conduct of his pilgrims, he was filled with shame and strongly rebuked them.

Almost none of the crusaders ever made it to the Holy Land, and the unstable Latin empire siphoned off much of Europe's crusading energy. The legacy of the Fourth Crusade was the deep sense of betrayal the Latins had instilled in their Greek coreligionists. With the events of 1204, the schism between the Catholic West and Orthodox East was complete. As an epilogue to the event, Pope Innocent III, the man who had launched the expedition, thundered against the crusaders thus:

"You vowed to liberate the Holy Land but you rashly turned away from the purity of your vow when you took up arms not against Saracens but Christians… The Greek Church has seen in the Latins nothing other than an example of affliction and the works of Hell, so that now it rightly detests them more than dogs".

Eight hundred years after the Fourth Crusade, Pope John Paul II twice expressed sorrow for the events of the Fourth Crusade. In 2001, he wrote to Christodoulos, Archbishop of Athens, saying "It is tragic that the assailants, who set out to secure free access for Christians to the Holy Land, turned against their brothers in the faith. The fact that they were Latin Christians fills Catholics with deep regret." In 2004, while Bartholomew I, Patriarch of Constantinople, was visiting the Vatican, John Paul II asked "How can we not share, at a distance of eight centuries, the pain and disgust." In the opinion of Jonathan Phillips, this was "an extraordinary statement — an apology to the Greek Orthodox Church for the terrible slaughter perpetrated by the warriors of the Fourth Crusade

The Fourth Crusade was one of the last of the major crusades to be directed by the Papacy, and even the Fourth quickly fell out of Papal control. After bickering between laymen and the papal legate led to the collapse of the Fifth Crusade, later crusades were directed by individual monarchs, mostly directed against Egypt. Only one subsequent crusade the Sixth, succeeded in restoring Jerusalem to Christian rule, and only briefly.

· the fifth, which included the conquest of Damietta, Egypt; 1217:

By processions, prayers, and preaching, the Church attempted to set another crusade on foot, and the Fourth Council of the Lateran (1215) formulated a plan for the recovery of the Holy Land. A crusading force from Hungary, Austria, and Bavaria achieved a remarkable feat in the capture of Damietta in Egypt in 1219, but under the urgent insistence of the papal legate, Pelagius, they proceeded to a foolhardy attack on Cairo, and an inundation of the Nile compelled them to choose between surrender and destruction.

· the sixth, in which Frederick II took part, 1228-29:

In 1228, Emperor Frederick II set sail from Brindisi (on the Adriatic) for Syria, even though under a papal excommunication. Through diplomacy he achieved unexpected success, Jerusalem, Nazareth, and Bethlehem being delivered to the Crusaders for a period of ten years. This was the first major crusade not initiated by the Papacy, a trend that was to continue for the rest of the century.

· the seventh, led by St. Louis, 1249-52:

The papal interests represented by the Templars brought on a conflict with Egypt in 1243, and in the following year an Egyptian force stormed Jerusalem. Although this provoked no widespread outrage in Europe as the fall of Jerusalem in 1187 had done, Louis IX of France organized a crusade against Egypt from 1248 to 1254, leaving from southern France. It was a failure and Louis spent much of the crusade living at the court of the Crusader kingdom in Acre.

· the eighth, also under St. Louis, 1270:

The eighth Crusade was organized by Louis IX in 1270, to come to the aid of the remnants of the Crusader states in Syria. However, the crusade was diverted to Tunis, where Louis spent only two months before dying. The Eighth Crusade is sometimes counted as the Seventh, if the Fifth and Sixth Crusades are counted as a single crusade. The Ninth Crusade is sometimes also counted as part of the Eighth.

the ninth, under Edward I of England, 1271:

The future Edward I of England undertook another expedition in 1271, after having accompanied Louis on the Eighth Crusade. He accomplished very little in Syria and retired the following year after a truce.

With the fall of Antioch (1268), Tripoli (1289), and Acre (1291) the last traces of the Christian rule in Syria disappeared.

This division is arbitrary and excludes many important expeditions, among them those of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. In reality the Crusades continued until the end of the seventeenth century.

Saint Albert, bishop of Vercelli Italy was made patriarch of Jerusalem by Innocent III in1205. He governed his see from the city of Acre because Jerusalem itself was under Saracen occupation. He was respected and trusted by Christians and Moslems alike

Summary

There was but one crusade. It was the great breaking out of all Western Europe into the Orient for the rescue of the Holy Sepulcher. Within a life it had failed. With Jerusalem in the hands of the Infidel the purpose of the original campaign was gone, its fruits lost.

It had been one continuous battle. Reinforcements were inadequate. Christendom could not or would not supply in sufficient amount the recruitment necessary to holding its bastion in the East and that is why the Crusades failed.